Current:Home > ScamsHunter Biden sues IRS over whistleblowers who criticized DOJ probe -Keystone Wealth Vision
Hunter Biden sues IRS over whistleblowers who criticized DOJ probe
View
Date:2025-04-27 22:45:12
Hunter Biden has filed a lawsuit in a Washington, D.C., federal court against the Internal Revenue Service over alleged "unlawful disclosures" made by a pair of whistleblowers who accused government prosecutors of mishandling their investigation into the president's son -- a claim the Justice Department has denied but nonetheless breathed fresh life into Hunter Biden's legal tribulations.
Attorneys for Biden, 53, accused Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, both veteran IRS investigators, of waging a campaign to "to embarrass and inflict harm on Mr. Biden" by improperly sharing his private taxpayer information in media interviews.
"During these interviews, Mr. Shapley and Mr. Ziegler provide unsubstantiated and selectively chosen allegations of nefarious and potentially criminal behavior," wrote Hunter Biden's attorney, Abbe Lowell.
MORE: Hunter Biden indicted by special counsel on felony gun charges
The IRS "failed to take reasonable steps to prevent its personnel from unlawfully disclosing" Hunter Biden's confidential taxpayer information in violation of the Privacy Act, Lowell argued.
After a nearly five-year probe, Hunter Biden was indicted last week on felony gun charges, two months after a plea deal he had negotiated with prosecutors fell apart under questioning from a federal judge.
Those developments happened in the wake of troubling claims made by Shapley and Ziegler, who approached Congress in April with allegations that senior Justice Department officials blocked efforts to bring more serious charges against Hunter Biden, limited their investigative scope, and refused to grant special counsel status to the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney who oversaw the case.
The Justice Department and Attorney General Merrick Garland have denied those claims, defending U.S. Attorney David Weiss' independence over the matter. Weiss himself wrote lawmakers in June to clarify that he had "full authority" to bring charges whenever and wherever he chose.
But those denials have done little to blunt concerns that the Justice Department offered the younger Biden a "sweetheart deal" from prosecutors, as congressional Republicans have claimed. Nearly half of Americans said they were not confident that the Justice Department has handled its probe of Hunter Biden in a fair and nonpartisan manner, according to an ABC News/Ipsos poll from earlier this month.
In a statement responding to the lawsuit, attorneys for Shapley said, "Neither IRS SSA Gary Shapley nor his attorneys have ever released any confidential taxpayer information except through whistleblower disclosures authorized by statute. Once Congress released that testimony, like every American citizen, he has a right to discuss that public information."
IRS officials declined to comment on the suit.
In the course of their "media circus," as Lowell framed it, Shapley and Ziegler made statements that fell "well outside the bounds of the whistleblower protections."
Congressional Republicans voted in June to release the transcripts of interviews they'd conducted with the two whistleblowers. But in subsequent television and podcast interviews, the whistleblowers made statements not included in their testimony, Lowell wrote -- despite instruction from the committee not to share what was discussed in the interview "to individuals not designated to receive such information."
As a result, according to the lawsuit, the IRS shirked its responsibility to protect Hunter Biden's tax information from being made public.
MORE: Timeline: Hunter Biden under legal, political scrutiny
"The IRS has never instructed Mr. Shapley, Mr. Ziegler, or their representatives to refrain from publicly and unlawfully disclosing Mr. Biden's confidential tax return information, much less taken reasonable steps to prevent its personnel from unlawfully accessing and disclosing Mr. Biden's tax return information," Lowell wrote.
Attorneys for Hunter Biden are seeking $1,000 in damages for each "unauthorized disclosure" of his tax information, a declaration that the IRS "willfully, knowingly, and/or by gross negligence, unlawfully disclosed Mr. Biden's confidential tax return information," and any documents in the IRS' possession related to Hunter Biden's tax information.
veryGood! (1868)
Related
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Sophia Bush’s 2 New Tattoos Make a Bold Statement Amid Her New Chapter
- 11 Spook-tacular Sales To Shop This Weekend: Aerie, Chewy, Madewell, Nordstrom Rack, Ulta & More
- How law enforcement solved the case of a killer dressed as a clown
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Another first for JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, selling shares of the bank he’s run for nearly 2 decades
- Coast Guard ends search for 3 Georgia fishermen missing at sea for nearly 2 weeks
- Youngkin administration says 3,400 voters removed from rolls in error, but nearly all now reinstated
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Coyotes’ Travis Dermott on using Pride tape, forcing NHL’s hand: ‘Had to be done’
Ranking
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Should Toxic Wastewater From Gas Drilling Be Spread on Pennsylvania Roads as a Dust and Snow Suppressant?
- 6 of 9 deputies charged in death of man beaten in Memphis jail plead not guilty
- Youngkin administration says 3,400 voters removed from rolls in error, but nearly all now reinstated
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Wisconsin judge rules that GOP-controlled Senate’s vote to fire top elections official had no effect
- Brie Larson's 'Lessons in Chemistry': The biggest changes between the book and TV show
- Biden will face a primary bid from Rep. Dean Phillips, who says Democrats need to focus on future
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Salman Rushdie could confront man charged with stabbing him when trial begins in January
You need to know these four Diamondbacks for the 2023 World Series
These numbers show the staggering toll of the Israel-Hamas war
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Ex-Michigan star says someone 'probably' out to get Wolverines in sign-stealing scandal
China’s chief epidemiologist Wu Zunyou who helped drive the anti-COVID fight dies at age 60
How a South Dakota priest inspired 125 years of direct democracy — and the fight to preserve it